Home | Stories | Reviews | TreoCast | Treo Store | Accessories | Software | Discussion at webOS Nation | Mobile | About | Search
 
treocentral.com >> Products & Reviews >> Software
Brain Hand Games

Mon Dec 3, 2007 - 10:30 AM EST - By Andre Kibbe

Overview

Back in the early Nineties, I was wandering in a used bookstore and stumbled on a copy of an intriguing title: Brain Fitness: A Proven Program to Improve Your Memory, Logic, Attention Span, Organizational Ability and More. The program was the work of Monique Le Poncin, a French researcher who studied senility, theorizing that a large part of the illness was due to the brain rapidly falling into disuse after retirement. She claimed that conducting patients through a series of mental calisthenics, like timed memory and pattern recognition exercises, could slow or even reverse the onset of senility (“cerebral aging,” as she called it). Whether or not that’s true, I do know that I enjoyed working through the Brain Fitness regimen, and did experience an increase in certain mental faculties, like memory and calculation, during and shortly after the training period.

15 years after Brain Fitness was published, a Japanese researcher, Dr. Ryuta Kawashima, published a book along similar lines: Train Your Brain: 60 Days to a Better Brain. Unlike Le Poncin’s book, which failed to stimulate enough brains to earn a second edition, Train Your Brain developed a cult following in Japan, enticing Nintendo to contact the author and port the regimen to the Nintendo DS. The resulting puzzle video game, titled Brain Age: Train Your Brain in Minutes a Day! in the US, was a smash hit, with the first version selling around 70,000 copies, and the second version garnering 850,000 in preorders alone.

Finding an equivalent game for the Palm seemed like, well, a no-brainer—until I actually went searching. There are a few brain training options on the Windows Mobile side (further temptation for me to get that HTC Touch contraption), but only two apps for Palm OS appeared to fit this genre: Advanced Brain Trainer, which I’ll be reviewing soon, and the one by Handcase currently under discussion, Brain Hand Games.

Handcase’s website, Handycase.com (yes, the URL for Handcase is Handycase.com) describes Brain Hand as a set of games to help the player “Theorize, Analyze, Test, Calculate, Think, Memorize, Visualize, Play.” That’s an ambitious agenda, but note from the outset that Brain Hand does not emulate Brain Age’s methodology of testing for and harvesting mental performance metrics. Brain Hand’s games happen to fall under the common theme of brain teasers, or puzzle games, but they lack the systematic training aspect that distinguishes Nintendo’s series. That might not be a problem, depending on your expectations, but it was for this writer.



Setup

Setup is simple: pay for it and download it--in that order. Unfortunately, there’s no demo version of Brain Hand. You’ll have to pony up $20 on the front end. Why, you ask? “Internal politics,” says Handcase’s site in one place, and “world-wide politics” in the company’s FAQ. “For world-wide politics we do not produce demo or shareware version [sic] of our products, however the images that are available to the right of the description of each product that is, what it will see is what will receive [sic].” They probably mean policy, not politics, which is by no means the only message from Handcase that gets lost in translation.


The Games

Notice the latter quoted sentence’s tortured phraseology, which I’ve left unaltered to illustrate a problem that blights Brain Hand throughout its ten games. The English translations are awful. If the games’ awkward captions and instructions only made them less slick than their native counterparts, the issue could be overlooked. But in several games, the translations actually inhibit the player’s ability to apprehend their rules. I had to give up entirely on more than one game because its instructions are incomprehensible. These aren’t exactly first-person shooter games that transcend language.


My Favorities

Word Scramble is a sliding block puzzle. The difficulty can be set to five levels, from Basic to “Extreme Hard” (I’ll avoid identifying further spelling and grammatical errors henceforth, and just quote them unchanged). A “Moves Limit” assignment can be toggled on or off. You have up to 140 moves to solve the puzzle on the Basic setting, and 40 moves on Extreme Hard. Word Scramble isn’t a much different experience than the wooden or plastic version we’re all used to, but having new solutions to find gives the electronic version a much longer shelf life.


Reflex will be familiar to anyone old enough to remember Simon, an addictive Milton Bradley game from the late Seventies that was basically an electronic distillation of Concentration. Four buttons of different colors would individually flash in an iteratively growing sequence, and the player would have to enter that sequence, replicating it from memory. The layout here is different from the classic version, but the concept is identical. It even bumps this up a notch by adding more buttons with each run. I love this game, and it really does provide a mental workout.


Handlocked is another sliding block puzzle. Instead of letters, solid-colored blocks are arranged into patterns previewed with the Goal button. This game shares Word Scramble’s configuration settings—e.g. Level, Moves Limit, etc. I found playing Handlocked useful for enhancing my play of Word Scramble, since the solid colors allowed me to think more abstractly about my puzzle strategy without getting too lured into the content of each block, or the words they form.


Marathon is not really a game so much as a straightforward arithmetic gymnasium. You pick one of four operations to work out against the clock: addition, subtraction, multiplication or division. As with all the games in this suite, the interface could use a lot more sheen. The randomly scattered numerals in the background make the overall appearance excessively busy. Fortunately, Marathon is functional, and its rules are self-evident. It wouldn’t be much fun to have to consult its instructions, among which is: “You can change of operation during the game, but we recommend that she goes until the limit of each operation.”



Less Fun

Bones & Rocks has two modes. In its Tic Tac Toe mode, Bones & Rocks represents X’s and O’s with, well, bones and rocks. I can only enjoy this so much, since Tic Tac Toe is, well, Tic Tac Toe. Sorry, the thrill is gone. B&R’s Solitare mode was more challenging. Bones and rocks are laid out to fill a 3 x 3 table, and the object is to transform the table to all X’s (bones). The operations that accomplish this are hard to describe, even to myself. My game improved by intuition more than conscious strategy, which is intriguing on some level, but not intellectually satisfying as a “brain” game.

The same was even more true of ImagesPair. Despite its simple appearance, I had to intuit my way through this game due to its poor documentation: “In the game table touch detales, for play. Touch ever play for give the pair of the equal images. Just simple.” Indeed. It seems to come down to selecting an image in a given table that bears a relationship with an image that’s been highlighted. I could never discern their relationships consistently, and wasn’t having much fun in the process, so I eventually gave up.



Problematic Games

One game with fairly clear written instructions was AWE. Unfortunately they were written by Oware.org for the African board game, Oware, on which Brain Hand’s version is based. Enough disparities exist between the board game and its handheld adaptation to create problems for this player. Any time I reached the point of thinking I “got” the game, my score would ebb to remind me that my getting it was mere wishful thinking. Another game abandoned.


Minotaur’s Labyrinth was an extreme disappointment, considering how cool it promised to be from the title. My copy didn’t work, period. Tapping the Start button reverts the app to the home menu, and the mazes don’t enforce their own walls (you can draw a line straight through a maze). I must have gotten a bad apple, since Handcase sells ML as a standalone game. It wouldn’t sell if other players had similar problems, so I’m inclined to give the company the benefit of the doubt. As for my experience, ML was little more than an Etch-a-Sketch with decorative backgrounds.

Numeral: again, incomprehensible instructions. “It joins 3 or more equal numbers in horizontal line or vertical line. When grouping they will disappear by new combinations.” I never did figure out how to “join” the numbers, as they were unresponsive to tapping or dragging.


In Papyrus Coil, the player is supposed to “Remove any number of papyrus coil from a single row. Win who takes the last papyrus coil loses.” I could never figure out how to avoid taking the last papyrus coil, and never discerned the Palm-as-opponent’s pattern for taking papyruses (papyri?), so I consistently lost. I don’t like losing.



Conclusion

This is a grab bag. If you’re expecting to score 10 great games for $20, you’ll probably be disappointed. There are a few good games here, and they’ll probably be different for each player. Even the better games are marred by kludgy interfaces, so it’s hard to recommend this series, especially since it lacks a demo version.

If it isn’t already obvious, the main problem with the games is the faux-English throughout. I stress that the examples I’ve quoted are exactly as written, and haven’t selected exceptionally bad ones for effect. The developer’s native language appears to be Portuguese, and I get the sense that he hired a cheap freelance translator whose primary language was neither Portuguese nor English. Judging from summaries of subsequent titles on Handycase.com, the translations are slowly improving.

It would be interesting to see how much better the games would be in their native language. English speakers are far more likely to get a workout from interpreting the instructions than actually playing the games.






Treo accessory store

Criteria 

Rating

Design 2
Playability 2
User Interface 2
Cost/Benefit 3
Overall
(not an average)
Pros
  • Large number of games to choose from (10)
  • Good emphasis on memory and calculation
  • Compatible with older models (e.g. Treo 600)
  • Cons
  • Poorly translated instructions
  • Unspectacular graphics
  • No sound or animation


  •  
    User Opinions
    No reader opinions available.
    Would you recommend Brain Hand Games?
    Yes   No  

    Product Info

    Sponsored Links


    Brain Hand Games from
    TreoCentral Store


    References
    Actions
    > Print this page
    > Digg!

     
     

    Copyright 1999-2016 TreoCentral. All rights reserved : Terms of Use : Privacy Policy

    TREO and TreoCentral are trademarks or registered trademarks of palm, Inc. in the United States and other countries;
    the TreoCentral mark and domain name are used under license from palm, Inc.
    The views expressed on this website are solely those of the proprietor, or
    contributors to the site, and do not necessarily reflect the views of palm, Inc.
    Read Merciful by Casey Adolfsson